Digital Dopamine: The Awareness-Behavior Paradox in Social Media Usage

  • Hein Htet Aung Rangsit University
  • Sai Hark Poo Hseng
  • Kazuma Noguchi
  • Kaung Pyae Shan
Keywords: Digital Dopamine, Awareness-Behavior Paradox, Social Media, Addiction, Platform Engineering

Abstract

Social media platforms have become ingrained in daily life in recent years, especially among young adults and college students. Although these platforms provide chances for communication, amusement, and information exchange, worries about excessive screen time and its behavioral and psychological effects are becoming more widespread. Despite this growing awareness, there is a paradox between knowledge and behavior because many users continue to use social media obsessively despite widespread awareness of these possible risks. This study examines this phenomenon, commonly referred to as the awareness–behavior paradox in social media usage, where users possess cognitive awareness of the harmful effects of excessive screen time yet remain unable to reduce their consumption. Through a quantitative survey of 500 university students, this study examines how specific platform design features exploit dopaminergic reward pathways to create habit loops that override conscious intent. Utilizing the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework, our findings reveal that infinite scroll (r=0.478, p<0.001) and auto-play features (r=0.432, p<0.001) significantly correlate with habit automaticity. Notably, 38.2% of respondents exhibited the core paradox: high awareness coupled with continued compulsive use. Furthermore, social validation metrics (r=0.543, p<0.001) emerged as powerful drivers of habit formation, confirming that variable reward mechanisms successfully override rational risk assessment. A positive correlation between user awareness and paradoxical behavior (r=0.624, p<0.001) demonstrates that cognitive knowledge alone is insufficient to alter digital habits. The research finding concludes by suggesting that mitigating social media addiction requires a shift from user-level self-regulation to structural platform interventions, advocating for the integration of ethical friction in application design.

Published
2026-05-11
Section
Paper from Thailand