Psychological Safety Environment in Nursing Simulation-Based Learning

Main Article Content

ณัฐพล ยุวนิช
ฐิติชญาน์ ปิยภัทรธนัสไชย
สุนิษา เชือกทอง

Abstract

The purpose of this academic paper is to present the concept and importance of psychological safety in simulation-based learning (SBL) in nursing education. Although this form of teaching and learning is an effective strategy for developing clinical competencies and clinical judgement, the pressure of evaluation and the fear of making errors frequently induce anxiety, which serves as a significant impediment to the learning process. The content of the article covers the cultivation of psychological safety in three phases of simulation-based instruction: 1) pre-briefing phase, through creating fiction contracts and permission to fail; 2) simulation phase, by using scaffolding techniques, managing observer roles, and timeout/freeze frame; and 3) debriefing phase, emphasizing explicit and implicit strategies.


Learning management grounded in psychological safety can help turn fear into curiosity. Encourage learners to dare to reflect on real experiences and develop both hard skills and soft skills to their full potential. As a result, they are ready for the nursing practicum, work effectively with a multidisciplinary team, and provide safe, efficient patient care in real-world settings.

Keywords:
psychological safety, simulation - based learning, nursing education, clinical judgment

Article Details

Section
Academic Articles

References

ณัฐพล ยุวนิช, ธนัสมัญญ์ เหลืองกิตติก้อง, นิธิมา คันธะชุมภู, ระวินันธ์ ธัชศิรินิรัชกุล, จรัสศรี อัธยาศัย และ ศศิพินท์ ศุภมนตรี บัวพล. (2568). การเรียนการสอนด้วยสถานการณ์จำลองเสมือนจริง: ความท้าทายของการศึกษาพยาบาล. วารสารการพยาบาลและสุขภาพ สสอท., 7(2), e3821.

Abdulmohdi, N., & McVicar, A. (2024). Student nurses' perceptions of the role of high-fidelity simulation in developing decision-making skills for clinical practice: A qualitative research study. SAGE Open Nursing, 10. doi:10.1177/23779608241255299

Kindi, Z. A., Jabri, W. Z., Zadjali, M. A., & Muliira, J. (2025). Utilizing simulation in community health nursing education: A scoping review of current trends and applications. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 1055. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03718-1

Clark, T. R. (2020). The 4 stages of psychological safety: Defining the path to inclusion and innovation. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. doi:10.2307/2666999

INACSL Standards Committee, Watts, P. I., McDermott, D. S., Alinier, G., Charnetski, M., Ludlow, J., . . . Nawathe, P. A. (2021). Healthcare simulation standards of best practice™ simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.009

INACSL Standards Committee, Charnetski, M., & Jarvill, M. (2021). Healthcare simulation standards of best practice™ operations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.012

Ito, A., Sato, K., Yumoto, Y., Sasaki, M., & Ogata, Y. (2021). A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care. Nursing Open, 9(1), 467–489. doi:10.1002/nop2.1086

Karolinska Institutet. (2025). Fostering psychological safety in the educational setting. Retrieved April 3, 2026, from https://staff.ki.se/education-support/common-perspectives-in-education/fostering-psychological-safety-in-the-educational-setting

Kolbe, M., Eppich, W., Rudolph, J., Meguerdichian, M., Catena, H., Cripps, A., … Cheng, A. (2020). Managing psychological safety in debriefings: A dynamic balancing act. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(3), 164–171. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470

Kostovich, C. T., Schmidt, L. A., & Oosterhouse, K. J. (2024). Conceptualizing student experiences of psychological safety in simulation: A grounded theory study. Journal of Nursing Education, 63(7), 427–433. doi:10.3928/01484834-20240505-05

Madsgaard, A., & Svellingen, A. (2025). The benefits and boundaries of psychological safety in simulation-based education: An integrative review. BMC Nursing, 24, 922. doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03575-y

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346

Porges, S. W. (2022). Polyvagal theory: A science of safety. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 16. doi:10.3389/fnint.2022.871227

Salo, V., Rikala, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Hämäläinen, R. (2025). Emotions in nursing students’ simulations: A qualitative case study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 101, 101701. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101701

Saragih, I. D., Tarihoran, D. E. T. A. U., Lin, W. T., & Lee, B-O. (2024). Outcomes of scenario-based simulation courses in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 136, 106145. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106145

Sharma, H., Patil, A. D., & Baviskar, A. (2023). Fiction contract: Its importance in simulation-based medical education. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 12(5), 766–770. doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232579

Turner, S., Harder, N., Martin, D., & Gillman, L. (2024). Psychological safety in simulation: Perspectives of nursing students and faculty. Nurse Education Today, 122, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105712

Wang, Q., Zhang, X., Zhang, N., & Su, J. (2025). Error management climate, psychological security, and employee bootleg innovation behavior: The moderating role of risk-taking traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1538584. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1538584

Most read articles by the same author(s)