The School Administration Guidelines for Teacher Quality Development in the 21st Century, The Secondary Educational Service Area Office, Phetchaburi
Abstract
The objectives of this research were to study the conditions, problems and the operation method for teacher quality development in 21st century, the Secondary Educational Service Area Office, Phetchaburi. The 16 participants were selected as sampling group: 2 educational administrators, 9 educational institution administrators, 4 experts and 1 teacher. The data were collected by semi-structured interview. The quantitative data were analyzed by Content Analysis and Common Conclusion.
The research findings are as follows: educational development is not continual due to the change of educational policies. Moreover, administration in the educational service area office and educational institutions have been still lacking the participation. Problems to perform the duties of teachers found that, most teachers still lack development and training, lack of language skills, media, new innovation, new technology, information and creative skills in organizing new learning activities. A task other than the task of teaching and student care. The management or operation without the system and lack of planning. There were 3 factors for the operation method for teacher quality development in 21st century; the first factor was educational the School administration process composed of 5 components: 1) management 2) teacher skill development 3) applying 4) networking and 5) continuous supervision. The second factor was teacher quality development in 21st century composed of 5 components: 1) learning management and innovation 2) media, technology and information 3) the spirituality of teacher 4) teacher leadership 5) measurement and evaluation and the third factor was the components of participatory educational the School administration consisted of 6 steps as follows: 1) planning 2) knowledge and understanding of work 3) performance 4) morale enhancement 5) evaluation of the operations and 6) revisions.
- บทความทุกเรื่องที่ตีพิมพ์เผยแพร่ได้ผ่านการพิจารณาทางวิชาการโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิในสาขาวิชา (Peer review) ในรูปแบบไม่มีชื่อผู้เขียน (Double-blind peer review) อย่างน้อย ๓ ท่าน
- บทความวิจัยที่ตีพิมพ์เป็นข้อค้นพบ ข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนเจ้าของผลงาน และผู้เขียนเจ้าของผลงาน ต้องรับผิดชอบต่อผลที่อาจเกิดขึ้นจากบทความและงานวิจัยนั้น
- ต้นฉบับที่ตีพิมพ์ได้ผ่านการตรวจสอบคำพิมพ์และเครื่องหมายต่างๆ โดยผู้เขียนเจ้าของบทความก่อนการรวมเล่ม